BridgeCare Redesign

Redesign of current onboarding and user dashboard focused on motivation and instilling trust.

BridgeCare is a white-label platform with an emphasis on child care and community management made to support parents and providers. The company offers a platform to child care providers to promote their center and available programs to parents searching for child care.


overview

This was a three week remote project in partnership with BridgeCare and part of General Assembly’s 12 week UX design immersive.

Industry: Child care, Enterprise software


UX/UI Designers: Jackie Alejandro, Lena White, Visnu Ghosh

Team Role:

UX Researcher and UI Designer

Duration:

3 weeks

Tools Used:

Figma, Mural, Zoom, Google Drive

Methods:

User interviews, heuristic evaluations, competitive/comparative analysis, usability tests, affinity mapping, behavioral segments, stakeholder mapping, information architecture, wireframes, prototyping, service design blueprint


the challenge

We partnered with BridgeCare’s lead product designer, Hollie Stoyles, who gave us our initial problem focusing on the opportunity to make the process of updating program availability easier and more convenient for providers. Throughout our research and discovery phase we came across a larger issue.

“What we thought was a small problem was actually a larger one.”

Updating availability is a tedious process, but an important requirement for parents.

We found that keeping program availability up to date for providers was an important obstacle, but it wasn’t the main problem. What parents see and interact with on a provider profile is related to the center’s open availability.

the solution

Designing to motivate and gain trust

BridgeCare’s ultimate goal is to provide a platform that meets the parent’s demand for childcare with the provider’s supply for program availability. By motivating providers to complete their profile, results in more business opportunities for them.

As a result, we envisioned a new way for BridgeCare to motivate providers to update their availability and center information, so that parents using a BridgeCare site could feel more comfortable to learn, contact, and enroll their child into a child care center.

We redesigned the onboarding experience for providers, in addition to a dashboard with added features for providers to manage and edit their center’s online profile.

The design we created was inspired by the following:

accuracy

How might we guide providers to complete and maintain their center’s profile?

value

How might we motivate and show the providers the advantages of regularly maintaining their center’s information ? 

trust

How might we instill trust in the platform itself for both providers and parents?

Enterprise software and design constraints

Because BridgeCare is a white-label platform, we had to work with some constraints that had to include the number of available spots within a center and state licensing and ratings. In addition, we created a neutral design to encompass all of BridgeCare’s clients, but for the purpose of our prototype we used one of their current clients, Trying Together.

Onboarding flow

Onboarding flow

Provider dashboard

Provider dashboard

industry knowledge

Creating a stakeholder map to better understand how BridgeCare operates

With limited knowledge about the child care industry, we allotted a good amount of our time to research, learn, and understand how BridgeCare operates. To learn more, we created a stakeholder map to illustrate all of the parties and processes involved with the child care search. 

We learned that:

  1. Parents are currently struggling to adjust to working remotely and need extra help with care for their kids.

  2. Providers have space available in their centers and need a way to connect with parents to fill those spots.

  3. Government and local organizations partner with BridgeCare to provide a search tool by which parents and providers can connect.

user research

To prove our hypothesis about motivating providers to complete their profile, we conducted seven interviews with child care workers (admin, teachers, staff), which gave us great insight into what their day to day functions were and what were some constraints with enrollment and updating program information processes. Additional interviews and supplemental research provided by Hollie were also utilized in this process.

We further looked more into correspondences about updating availability between Hollie and providers and found that over a three month period, providers with availability were updating on a weekly basis but continued to have vacancies. Why was this happening?

We needed parent insights to learn more about why they would choose one center over another.

Therefore we expanded our interviews and conducted a usability test on their current site, which helped us understand the parent’s search process for child care and revealed the relationship between provider and parent.

behavioral segments

Two behavioral segments were created as a result from our research:

  1. Provider: Child care admin that is extremely busy managing two centers and struggles with keeping their information up to date

  2. Parent: Busy parent and actively searching for a child care center that encompasses their safety requirements especially because of COVID-19

“The reality of working in admin is there’s a lot to oversee in order to make sure everything is accounted for.”

— Provider

“As a parent, you want the information now and to know my child’s health and safety is a priority.”

— Parent

Establishing two primary BridgeCare users before helped guide our design to focus on motivating the provider to use BridgeCare for advertising their center, which directly affects how a parent searches and chooses a center for their child. 

We found that the more information  provided and displayed on a provider profile the more parents can feel, see, and trust the center.

the user’s journey

Identifying pain points of the user’s journey

From here, we created a service design blueprint to seek out opportunities for growth and to highlight moments of friction for the BridgeCare users in the child care search process. We gained a deeper understanding of how parents form trust with the providers based on the amount of information presented to them.

Due to our three week time constraint, we focused our design on the parent’s journey when selecting a center that best fits their child’s safety.

zoomed in service design blueprint

zoomed in service design blueprint

The way information is collected and displayed about a center from the provider, did not meet the needs of the parents.

revised problem

BridgeCare needs a way to motivate providers to update their availability and center profile to its maximum potential, so that parents can feel comfortable enough to learn more and ultimately contact the center with the information provided.

To further our design, we created specific features within the onboarding process and center profile management dashboard to instill trust and motivation for the provider, which would impact the parent’s search process.

design strategy

Motivating the provider

Based on our user interviews, we found that providers are extremely busy individuals who struggle to balance their daily duties and to update their center’s online profile regularly.

Contact.png

In our prototype, we envisioned a trust-o-meter, in order to create a sense of motivation for providers to complete their profile.

Our revised solution included a profile strength tool, which would be present in the initial onboarding process and provider dashboard in order to motivate the provider to fully complete the center’s profile.

Contact.png

We wanted to show provider’s the importance of having a completed profile and how it would ensure trust with parents. This idea tested well because our users related the concept to password strength and motivation.

Another way to motivate the providers was by implementing pro tip boxes throughout the onboarding process and on the provider dashboard. The language used with this feature was incredibly effective and tested well with participants in our usability test by explaining the value of a completed profile and keeping information up to date.

pro tip boxes

pro tip boxes

Instilling trust for parents

BridgeCare serves clients across many states with different licensing requirements and rating systems. For the purpose of our prototype we chose their client Trying Together, a non-profit organization supporting child care and education in Pennsylvania that uses the Keystone STARS rating system.

Screen Shot 2021-01-07 at 4.03.06 PM.png

In our research, we found that parents were confused with the state rating systems displayed on a center’s profile. Many thought the stars were reviews and often overlooked centers with two stars or less, which could have negative effects on the center and their availability.

Frame 1.png

I suggested to my team this idea of a state ratings tooltip based on our research and usability tests to create transparency between the parent and BridgeCare, so that they would grow awareness of the information presented to them and develop a sense of trust during their search for child care.

state provider ratings tooltip

state provider ratings tooltip

By providing an explanation of the rating system, a parent could potentially qualify and trust a center more despite a lower star rating, knowing it could be caused by a minor infraction.

next steps

If we had more time, my team and I would like to integrate the following ideas in future sprints to improve the experience for both parent and provider. 

  • Elaborate the profile strength bar. Creating a bar with more division by prioritizing the importance of one section over another would give more clarity upon completing the profile.

  • Providing more resources. By giving more resources for the provider, it would motivate a provider to continue to use BridgeCare’s platform.

  • Updating highlights section. The order and grouping of this section could be improved for providers when they want to make edits. This would also help clarify center information for parents.

  • Focus on information architecture. We would want to reorganize how the information is displayed for parents in the search result, which we started with the center’s profile. In our usability test, parents overlooked certain centers based on the highlights shown.

  • Incorporating virtual tours. Parents are concerned with their child’s safety, so this would create a new level of transparency between provider and parent.

  • Mobile first design. Most providers using BridgeCare platforms are less tech savvy and only make edits through mobile devices.